Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1995-05-03 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1995-05-03 House Journal Page 1836 HB 78 The following, which had been moved to the bottom of the calendar to follow citations (page 1826), was read the third time. CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 78(FIN) am "An Act relating to certain licenses and applications for licenses for persons who are not in substantial compliance with orders, judgments, or payment schedules for child support; relating to the duty to support children of minor parents; relating to the program of aid to families with dependent children, including the payment of aid in the case of pregnant minors and minors who are parents and the maximum amount of assistance that may be granted; proposing special demonstration projects within the program of aid to families with dependent children and directing the Department of Health and Social Services to seek waivers from the federal government to implement the projects; amending Alaska Rule of Civil Procedure 90.3; and providing for an effective date." The question being: "Shall CSHB 78(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 78(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 26 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 1995-05-03 House Journal Page 1837 HB 78 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Mackie, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, James, Kubina, MacLean, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis Absent: Martin And so, CSHB 78(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Vezey moved the court rule change. The question being: "Shall the court rule change be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 78(FIN) am Third Reading Court Rule YEAS: 39 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Kubina, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: MacLean And so, the court rule change was adopted. Representative Vezey moved the effective date clauses with the exception of the effective date clause in Section 20. 1995-05-03 House Journal Page 1838 HB 78 The question being: "Shall the effective date clauses with the exception of the effective date clause in Section 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 78(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date Except Section 20 YEAS: 38 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Robinson, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Brice, Kubina And so, the effective date clauses with the exception of the effective date clause in Section 20 were adopted. Representative Davies gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 78(FIN) am(efd pfld).